It requires broader context because corporations are the major users of the federal act and of most provincial acts, which may be an indication of something.
Third parties, like corporations, are the ones who got special privileges written into this act, such as special notifications and other means. The act is far too close a way to it. The three-part test that the courts have adopted is still very broad. The thing is, if you're talking about amending the act and broadening coverage to the corporate side, even if it's through agencies that receive public benefits, you still have to have much better corporate disclosure. In the United States, you have the Securities and Exchange Commission, which allows much more disclosure of public corporate information. The basic problem is there's way too little corporate material.
When I try to get drug information or I try to get loan arrangement information, they cite commercial confidentiality. Yes, there are very limited means that corporations which supply material—