Thank you.
Colleagues, we have a few minutes left. If I may, I would just like to ask one question.
It goes back to the directives that were issued by the President of the Treasury Board. We can do one of two things. We can make recommendations in one of two ways. Either we can have a very robust piece of legislation that clearly is very prescriptive in how things should happen, or we can have very loosely defined legislation and then, through the regulatory process, allow ourselves to be more nimble.
The nature of my question comes from the discussions that we've had at this committee on recommendations about such things as possibly opening up access to information requests to foreign countries and to individuals from outside Canada and so on. The legislative process is not nimble. The regulatory process is more nimble, but even that is not nimble.
In your experiences as individuals who are working very hard on behalf of Canadians, what are your personal opinions on what would be a better approach? Should we have broader overarching legislation that is highly dependent upon a regulatory framework, or should we actually have a very prescriptive legislative framework?