I'd like the opportunity to go back and reread the report with that question in mind, but I think I admire the audacity of the report to cross potentially a third rail of how our political parties are supposed to be regulating themselves on these issues. That, in my observation, went further than Information Commissioner Denham's recommendation to put an ethical pause on micro-targeting.
I do appreciate that. I think this is the main question for multiple governments around the world. How does the exemption of political targeting break down the whole system? In the case of Cambridge Analytica, political data was used for commercial purposes, and commercial data was used for political purposes. It's quite difficult—