I have two points. One is that I'd like us to look at a witness list. So far, we haven't done what is normally done on committee, which is to say how many meetings we'll have and then break down witnesses and decide whether we need them all. I'd like to do that.
I don't want to take any time from our wonderful, astute witnesses, but we're going into a week break and I would like to put out for attention that, given the Globe and Mail article on the allegations about SNC-Lavalin, and given what's being posted about the lobbying that was done, it will fall to Ethics to start to look at this, particularly the question of what kind of lobbying was being done by SNC-Lavalin.
I will be bringing a motion for discussion, because our committee will be expected to look at anything that has to do with allegations about improper lobbying that may have changed the direction of any kind of policy. I'll be bringing that forward at our next meeting.