It is the review committee. Now we learn from the Toronto Star that if this moves forward, it will divert a large, recurring revenue stream from the city into private hands, which was not in the original RFP.
You're saying you're talking about economies of scale, but the real estate committee said no to this and it went ahead anyway.
The Auditor General said that Sidewalk Labs was given more information than the competing bids. The Auditor General says the board was given just a weekend to discuss and understand the implication to the initial framework agreement before being asked to approve it.
Was the Auditor General wrong? Was she reading something else?