Perhaps I could talk about it a bit from the critical election incident public protocol perspective, just to say that for what determines whether the threshold is reached and whether Canadians are informed of something, the expectation is that—and I think this is fair to say from the intelligence perspective—it's more likely to come from a foreign source. That has been the pattern.
When we look at France, when we look at the U.S. and when we look at the U.K., the pattern has been one of foreign actors intervening, but the protocol is not limited to just foreign interference. The key component is an impact that affects the conduct of a free and fair election. If you are correct and there is something happening on the domestic side of such a magnitude that it impacts the conduct of a free and fair election, then it gets captured by the threshold.