In recommendation 6.1, “The Information Commissioner recommends that institutions be required to proactively publish information that is clearly of public interest.” So that raises the question, what is in the public interest?
An excellent example is the security of the screening process for the refugees—the intake. Mr. Levant, you were saying you were shocked that you would get a decision that, in 200 and something days, you would know the results of the questionnaire. I'm thinking that the questionnaire is probably a part of the integrity of the security screening process. Why would we let the bad guys know what questions we're asking in order to properly screen people coming in? Doesn't it seem sensible to you that the answer of “in excess of 200 days” would be that once we have everybody through the process, we can share aspects of that screening, but right now, no, we're not going to tell you?
I'm arguing back to your point to try to get the sense of public interest and security, and bringing it altogether. Do you see that side of it?