Maybe I will just take a moment to express, in solidarity, a little bit of frustration with the kind of haste of change that has been suggested by the government. I haven't been here many times. It is my first time, but I think what is emerging already pretty clearly is that at the level of general study, I think these issues are actually pretty well known. I think the recommendations are pretty clear. We have a great report by the Information Commissioner on how to move forward, and it is clear that there is a pretty wide-ranging set of reforms that need to take place if we are going to change the overall culture.
There has been this interim directive. The idea is that we really need to let these things settle and see what effect they have, and then we will know better whether we can move forward with more substantial reforms. I am just wondering, in the opinions of the experts, Mr. Gogolek and Mr. Conacher, what bearing do the initiatives taken in the interim directive actually have on the other things. If it turns out that just enforcing the $5 fee, and not requiring fees for research, printing, and stuff, is a bust in one way or another, how does that really have an impact on whether we are going to expand the scope of access to information, say, to crown corporations? I am just wondering what real relation the measures in the interim directive have to the other kinds of measures that we are being asked to wait on.