The Prime Minister said $5, and if you don't get it in time, you give that back. I think that $5 is enough to stop absolutely wasteful people, but it's not too high to stop low-income people, let's say, or people on a budget.
On the question of what a frivolous complaint is, let me give you an example. Did anyone drink a $16 orange juice? That sounds so trivial, small, and frivolous, but a lot turned on that. What to one person is trivia can be important to another. I think the bias should be toward openness.
Again, just because the Prime Minister's video is fresh in my mind, one of his key points was to modernize it. It's true. A lot of the cost involved is for physical photocopying. Why would you do that these days, when things can be done electronically? I think the vexatious aspect of making someone photocopy can be overcome just through technology. I really believe that.
Finally, if someone truly were vexatious, in civil court you could have them deemed to be a vexatious litigant by a judge, but you would have to really go and make your case to deny someone their day in court. By definition, I think governments find all critics vexatious and troublesome, until they're on the outside, in which case what they are doing is called “noble inquiry”.
We're in a building that calls the biggest troublemaker in the country Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition and gives them a free house. We love troublemakers in Parliament. It's the nature of our system.