To the extent that it makes sense to consider this question on a later occasion, it would make far more sense, in my view, to see the documentary production, see what is said, see if there's anything new there substantively that needs to be addressed and see how the justice committee reacts to that.
Ms. Ramsey, I take your concerns to heart, but it's still appropriate, I think, as far as our parliamentary colleagues are concerned, to see how they react, where that committee is properly seized with it, and then to make a determination. I don't think it makes any sense today to make any determination when we don't know what is to come.
Mr. Kent, if you want to have this conversation again down the road, my view, as I've expressed, is that we are going to have the Ethics Commissioner sit right here, and we're going to be able to put to him questions about limitations or problems: problems with insufficient resources or problems with his mandate, or if he is sufficiently tasked with this. Those are the questions that I think this committee should be seized with right now, absent new information, as we don't know yet what is to come.
I respect the attempt to put this back on the agenda for me today, but the fact that this is premature isn't cured by saying, “Let's make a decision today and have it take effect a week from now.”