In a way, the reason transparency becomes the first step is that it's so hard to enforce any of these rules until a human rights commissioner can adequately assess what is going on. When we were asking questions of the information commissioner in the U.K. in November, her view was that her job was to make it explainable. Other regulators have other rules and perspectives and rights and values that they want to enforce, and it's then their job to take on their roles.
Is that the sense you get? Is that the right approach?