I don't have a specific answer for you, to be honest. It's exciting to me that you're asking that question, because I worry that many people believe that they don't see an alternative to technologies that somehow come out of nowhere and they are then subject to, so I'm excited by the idea that these are not corporate and that these are things that we all have to decide as a society.
As to how to achieve that practically, I think this is quite challenging. We can endorse the principle of “democratic participation”, for example, as given in the Montreal statement. How do we achieve that? There are some models. There's the Scandinavian model of participatory design. There are ideas, but still, currently, I think we look at a landscape that is dominated by what have been called big social monopoly computing platforms—AI—and it's hard to see exactly how you will have a voice in it.
I'm hopeful that some of the proposals I discussed in my opening statement, and that previously were in your last report about structural changes to the industry, might provide openings for which we see another kind of participation—for example, a public alternative.