Thank you for that excellent question.
There is no miracle solution.
The idea is to get all of civil society working together, the informatics, ethics and social science experts, as well as the industry stakeholders. There is more than one useful expertise. We will manage to reduce potential bias, preconceived ideas about the most vulnerable people, among others, by getting the various experts together and getting them to talk to each other. The reason is that the discussion among those experts will rationalize the debate. It might be a preconceived philosopher's idea to believe in the rationalization of the debate. However, in the context of meetings in Parliament or with citizens in libraries—we have done a lot of meetings in public libraries— dialogue leads to a rationalization of arguments and allows people to identify the prejudice that may be in them. That collaboration is really important.