I support the recommendation as to the level of funding, the composition of boards, and that sort of thing. I leave that to her to argue for.
The principle is this: follow the money. It's one that the Auditor General doesn't hesitate to do. Is government business being transacted? If government business is being transacted, then I think it should be accessible. You can have a discussion about how much funding, and about the composition, such as whether a majority of the board is appointed by the government. Those are the kinds of the details you'd work into legislation. But the principle is government business and follow the money.