Excellent.
Moving to cabinet confidences, you first recommended that the exclusion go and that it be based on exemptions.
If we turned to recommendation 4.27, I wonder if you could walk us through. You have five bullet points here as to where the cabinet confidences exemption should not apply. The first two strike me as.... Those would be “advice and recommendations”. The same principles—that information should not be subject to advice and recommendations—would apply here; “analyses of problems and policy options” would be subject to the injury test, the advice and recommendations.
Could you speak to the other bullet points, as to why you believe they should not be part of the cabinet confidences exemption?