Nathaniel Erskine-Smith at the Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics Committee

On May 19th, 2016. See this statement in context.

May 19th, 2016 / 9:10 a.m.

Liberal

Nathaniel Erskine-Smith Liberal Beaches—East York, ON

I have only 15 seconds left, so really quickly....

The second bullet point is “to analyses of problems and policy options to Cabinet’s consideration”. In your view, that would be excluded from the exemption for cabinet confidences. Presumably that would be under “advice and recommendations” and subject to an injury test. Is that right?

See context to find out what was said next.