On that point, I appreciate the fact that you have those delegated people to come in.
The only thing I'm a bit cautious about, and maybe you can relieve that caution, is the fact that when you're dealing with a national security matter, you're dealing with a domestic agenda, with an international agenda, and you may be dealing with other governments. How do you believe that those specially delegated people would be able to absorb all of the decision-making, the sort of forward-looking things, that a government would have to look at? There would have to be a political decision. There might have to be an international diplomatic decision. There might have to be a domestic decision.
How do you believe that one person, who doesn't come from that background but is looking at the information objectively, can provide the best analysis of that material?