There would be different considerations to different parts of it. If you're just thinking about the resolution part, whether it's a hybrid or order-making model. I don't see there being any great difficulty moving from your present ombudsman model to a hybrid model.
I would think it would be even easier to move from an ombudsman model to a hybrid model than from an ombudsman model to an order-making model because you'd have to put in place procedures and rules and hearing practices, and so on. If you're going to give a body the power to make an enforceable order, one of the requirements in our system, relying on the rule of law, is that you proceed in a manner that gives all interested parties a right to be heard and in fair circumstances and so on, and to make presentations and file documents and file evidence. Then you do an assessment, write a decision on it, and issue the order as a result of that decision, justifying the order you're about to issue.
It seems to me that it would be far more burdensome to move from the existing ombudsman model to that model, than from the existing model to making the recommendation as they do now and leaving the burden on the public body to challenge the decision.