We didn't remove all exemptions. There are certain things that so clearly and manifestly should not be subject to disclosure that they speak for themselves; you don't have to make the case.
The most obvious one that I can think of is the preliminary police investigation of alleged crimes—for example, police reports that they file saying that they think Clyde Wells is guilty of a particularly offensive crime or robbery or fraud or whatever else. This is in the nature of police work. If they don't do that and are not free to express those opinions and explore them, they can't possibly do their investigative work properly and fully. To require those to be released would totally offend privacy so greatly—