Part of your review and your recommendations for the new act in Newfoundland and Labrador had a public interest override component. That's kind of a priority rule. Ministerial veto is another kind of priority rule. If you were wanting to have in federal legislation some kind of public-interest override, how do you think that would interact with a ministerial veto? What would be the consequences of trying to maintain both at the same time? Does one end up trumping the other?
On May 31st, 2016. See this statement in context.