I think that's what it came down to. We felt that was the logical place, because the Management of Information Act provides both for the creation and disposal of records at various times, when they're no longer needed, and so on. We thought that would be the ideal place to put it, because there is also an associated committee in place that oversees record-making within the government.
The concern emanated from something that many people said to us, which was the increasing tendency to make decisions without their being written down anywhere. It's happened in the electronic age where we can send pings to each other and there's no record of them. It creates obvious problems for governments if people.... For example, if I'm an employee, and I'm being asked to implement a decision for which there's no paper trail and no record, how am I to know how I'm supposed to carry out that decision?
We saw it as a very important thing, but logically we felt that it belonged in the Management of Information Act. That hasn't yet been put before the legislature, and I have no idea what the thinking of the current government is on that.