That's exactly right.
For institutions funded in part by government, $5 million is a significant amount of money. I would put to you that the principle is a de minimis principle, and I think Mr. Scarpaleggia picked up on this.
Take the Pan Am Games, for example, which hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars funded. The Taxpayers Federation would think as a matter of principle taxpayers ought to know how that money was spent.
There is a principle for extending coverage of the act to organizations where a significant amount of public money has been spent at the very least on access to information coverage being extended to how those funds were expended.
Do you agree?