Technological difficulty is an appropriate theme for today.
Mr. Israel was referring to our just released “Charter First” report, which is a position paper that CCLA has introduced, in which we are actually arguing that all legislation that's created in Canada should undergo charter review prior to being tabled. It's very much in line with the recommendation here that legislation that involves privacy implications should be reviewed by the appropriate body that can consider all of the implications, and in the case of the Privacy Act, we would say that would be the Privacy Commissioner. In general, we would be in favour of multi-level protection to make sure that charter-protected rights—and privacy is a quasi-constitutional right—are always subject to review and consideration in any kind of activity. Whether it's a multilateral treaty, a trade agreement, a new piece of legislation, or a new data processing system, there should always be at some appropriate level consideration of what the risks are going to be to people's privacy, and of course, a number of other factors.