Thank you.
I have a very broad question.
In your CBA analysis, Mr. Dickson, and from whatever readings I've also done, there has been some talk of reconciling the PIPEDA with some sort of privacy regime to make them more aligned. Of the two starkest differences that have been highlighted in PIPEDA, one is that there is a differential in accountability between a ministerial office and a private enterprise, in that there is a recourse on the government side to have ministerial accountability, while the recourse when you're dealing with private business is that the consumer can go somewhere else and find another service provider.
I also understand that there's the consent issue, because on the private sector side consent is given, but on the public sector side it's more statutory.
In trying to be effective and trying to be efficient, are there any other stark differences that you or Mr. Bennett or anybody else could highlight, or do you think the motivation of the committee should be somehow to reconcile the two so that there are not two different regimes out there, one for the private sector and one for the public sector, so that it would be easier for Canadians to understand one regime and the slight responsibilities that might have to be entertained between the public sector and the private sector?