Thanks for the question. On that last bit, I think it's not necessarily an either-or issue. I do think there is unquestionably a role for this committee on some of those issues. For example, one of the other issues that I've been spending a lot of time on lately is the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the TPP. As I'm sure you know, there are multiple committees that have been examining the impact of the TPP. Certainly, international trade, but not just international trade. Agriculture and others are taking a look at the implications of that agreement for their ambits.
I think the same is true when we take a look at what's taking place in that part of the national security consultation. I think there are clear implications for a number of other committees, and not just this committee either. For example, it seems to me it's pretty clear the implications of some of the issues that I've talked about have a huge impact, or would have a huge impact, on the communications industry, the industry committee, or ISAT, or whatever we're calling it nowadays. If it doesn't take a look at those issues, then I think we're missing a piece of the pie.