First of all, while sharing information among the Five Eyes is not the same as handing that information over to Egypt or Saudi Arabia, I think that abuses do take place and have taken place within our Five Eyes partners. There's clear evidence of that.
I'll particularly point to the U.K. and the fact that GCHQ has operated far beyond the kinds of limits that we've seen in other agencies. The U.K. is now talking about pulling away from the European Court of Human Rights. I think there are very serous concerns among our Five Eyes partners, so I wouldn't necessarily start from that perspective.
In terms of actually controlling the information, I think the best thing that can be done is to spell out very clearly and publicly the kinds of information we are willing to share, to have an open public debate about it, see what Canadians are and are not comfortable with, and have agreements that specifically reference those uses of information, with consequences if those agreements are not adhered to. You can spell out specifically in the agreement if it goes beyond this agreed-upon measure.