We did a submission to the Provincial Court of British Columbia on the availability online of non-conviction information, which is not exactly the question you're asking, and I would refer you to that to a certain extent.
There's also something called “practical obscurity”, where information is not widely disseminated. It's not available online, but it's still available if somebody wants to go and get it. Of course, we do have an open courts doctrine. The courts are supposed to be open, and judges do have control over their proceedings. If there is an appropriate case, then one party or another can apply to have information stricken that goes before the judge, who then decides. There are some mechanisms in place to deal with that, if there is some serious risk in the court at the time.