Only in the broadest sense. The privacy rules in different jurisdictions are quite variable.
In relation to international information sharing, which was your prior question about Five Eyes, for the most part, there's relatively little law that I'm aware of within the Five Eyes that would govern that carefully and thoroughly.
On the other hand, one of the differences is that for the most part, the Five Eyes allies have more robust review and more comprehensive review. When you talk about international information sharing, the difficulty is always reconciling domestic review by domestic review bodies with an internationalized process that might implicate the interests of foreign states. I'm not sure that anyone has yet derived a perfect solution to that conundrum.
In terms of domestic privacy laws, they're quite variable. I would say that Canada, relative to some of the Five Eyes, has quite robust domestic privacy laws.