That may be, but I would say that at the end of the day, to argue that the previous law led to concerns about what authority officials had with regard to sharing goes to whether the previous law was sufficiently clear and well understood. It doesn't go to the necessity for a new law. If, previously, officials were unclear, then the officials should have received better guidance and information as to what the law provided. But if this law, SCISA, is really necessary, it should not be so on the basis that previously officials were unclear. That lack of clarity doesn't necessitate legislation. It would be on the basis that not only was it unclear, but it was insufficient, that it was an impediment, and we've not seen evidence of that.
On November 22nd, 2016. See this statement in context.