Thank you very much. This is very interesting testimony.
I only have five minutes, so I'll ask you to try to keep your answers as short as possible.
My first question is in regard to the institutions that can send or receive information. In terms of your interest in Bill C-51, in regard to having so many institutions that can send information—from the Yukon Surface Rights Board to the federal Consumer Agency of Canada, which I didn't even know existed—has the case ever been made that they actually have information that is somewhat relevant to national security? Has there ever been a case made for the 17 agencies that are listed in schedule 3 that they have anything to do with it?
For instance, we have the Department of Finance, which deals with national security. It's on the recipient end. Has there ever been a case made for them to be on the recipient end of SCISA?