I don't agree with that. The section says “any person”. My concern with this....
I would agree with the first statement, that this act purportedly encourages information sharing. You don't need section 9 to do that.
I didn't have a chance to read her testimony, but the other piece is good faith. They may hang their hat on that, saying that these aren't malicious shares, but you can be negligent and act in good faith as well, in my view.
I think it includes the crown. I think it's pretty broadly worded. I think it's disingenuous to suggest that this facilitates sharing or—