Thank you.
I want to return to and get some comments about the cabinet decision-making, advice, and recommendations, the exemptions, and the various exemptions around cabinet information that have come up already in some of the questions.
I was particularly struck by one of the responses that Commissioner Clayton gave about having access to ensure that an exemption is proper. In the House of Commons, we've had questions raised about pecuniary interests of senior staff or spouses of ministers. We've been assured in the House that the Ethics Commissioner is setting out proper walls and proper barriers and that proper recusals will take place to avoid an actual conflict of interest, rather than just the appearance of conflict of interest.
In Alberta, you have access to items to see whether an exemption is proper. Is this perhaps one of the tools that could be used to ensure that proper walls or barriers around conflict of interest could be monitored?