With respect to relevance and necessity, Ms. Austin, we had John Davies from Public Safety before us, and he referenced an Auditor General report from 2009 that found that departments and agencies were not sharing intelligence information because of concerns related to privacy. He pointed to that as one example of why SCISA was put in place. He suggested, and the department officials made the case, that SCISA changes the disclosure rules but not the collection rules, so the standard of relevancy is only on the disclosure side.
When we talk about relevance and necessity and warrants, if we put in black and white clarity that the mandates of the recipient institutions have not changed, that they're subject to a necessity collection requirement and subject to warrants if their operating rules require them to obtain warrants to obtain information, does that satisfy the concern, or should we go further?