I was going to look for that, but I just thought maybe I'd try not to use up all the time. But I think it's important because the nature of the question that I asked earlier about trust and what we can do to engender the trust of Canadians in these processes is, I think, if not at odds, certainly taking a different tack from some of my Conservative colleagues, who are asking if this is a good tool. There are lots of things that would be good tools for law enforcement but don't adequately respect the rights of Canadians and don't give Canadians an adequate amount of confidence in their security officials. Charter issues notwithstanding, warrantless search and seizure I am sure would be a great tool for law enforcement, but it's not therefore acceptable.
How do you think we could recommend either that we change SCISA or scrap it and come up with something else that would give you that operational flexibility but pay adequate attention? I know that you guys are concerned with these questions and you have your internal guidelines. Canadians are not part of that conversation. They want to make sure that the guidelines you're following are actually enforceable by a third party. How can we get that into the law without creating so many hurdles to the sharing of information that something bad may happen that ought not to have happened and need not have happened?