I also want to touch on something else you raised, because there is an interesting point to be made here. I'm referring to the case of Google Spain. I'm sure you're aware of the case of Google Spain. What I found interesting in that case was that the search engine was told not to provide a link to the news article, but the news article was still deemed to be allowed to exist. It wasn't ubiquitous, but it could be searched.
You talk about the right to be forgotten. If we decide to make that a recommendation, how do you think we should structure the law to allow someone the right to be forgotten? What parameters do we go through? Do we go all the way and remove everything? Or are there some things that have to be there for the public interest or the public good? How do we balance that?