At the end of the day, the commissioner issues a recommendation, which obviously has a lot of weight, because it needs to be heeded. Otherwise, the government needs to go to court. But it is a recommendation. I think the procedural way in which these recommendations are made potentially would be lighter, less formal, less costly, and less open to challenges that it is potentially inconsistent with the promotion roles of the commissioner.
They are not far apart, I totally agree, but I think it's a distinction that matters. As I say, I agree with my colleague on what the ills are. The ills are mostly in terms of the length and duration of the process. I'm just suggesting a different way to get to the same place with fewer risks, in my view.