I'll give it a try. I don't doubt Michael and Colin may have responses, and David, too.
I'll quickly say that it is readily apparent that these issues have entered into the realm of trade negotiations. We saw it unquestionably within the Trans-Pacific Partnership, within the TPP. The Secretary of Commerce in the United States, Wilbur Ross, has talked about the need to address the digital economy as part of renegotiating NAFTA.
If you look at the e-commerce chapter in the TPP, you see there's a blueprint for the kinds of issues that we are likely to see come up within NAFTA. They include things like data localization and data transfer. I should note that they also included in the TPP a provision on countries being required to have a privacy law, but it was a very watered down version in light of the fact that the United States, while it has strong enforcement, doesn't have broad-based privacy rules.
I don't think there's any question that we're going to continue to face those pressures. In some instances that might be a good thing. David talked about what it would look like if the Privacy Commissioner were given order-making power. He suggested it would look like the Human Rights Commission. I would argue that it would look like just about everybody's privacy framework. It would look like the other privacy commissioners across the provinces. It would look more like what we see in the EU. It would even look like the Federal Trade Commission in the United States, where we do see order-making power and the ability to enforce the common approach in many other places. The outlier in this case, actually, is the federal Privacy Commissioner, who hasn't had those powers.