I can see you're well prepared, because you made comparisons. Thank you for mentioning this. Honestly, I don't think there's any change in position. In terms of privacy, but also the other areas affected by digital technology, each change in legislation has resulted in a very serious problem. This has already been mentioned, specifically by Mr. Young.
I think the principled approach in the legislation is quite good. That said, regarding the strengthening of the sanctioning powers of a monitoring body, such as the Office of the Privacy Commissioner, I didn't mention this possibility five years ago. The Office of the Commissioner did a very good job of changing things, as in the case of Facebook in 2009. In 2009, the Canadian Office of the Commissioner changed practices around the world. This is incredible, given that the legislation isn't very strict and contains very few constraints. I think we could still make things easier, because privacy has become more significant and the risks are more significant. The major change would involve the need to strengthen an organization's powers. I think that's the only important major change. However, the principled approach, apart from the consent matter, still seems applicable. This is apparent in particular in the text of the Privacy Commissioner, Mr. Therrien, who thinks this approach should be maintained.