Sure, I don't dispute that there are court hearings, but that doesn't get away from my question. If we have a civil case and a criminal case and the name is disclosed and procedural rights are protected—if “as a matter of public interest and transparency” the name is disclosed—why would we treat the bank differently? The bank can seek the court sealing of the document under the rules, but—
On April 11th, 2017. See this statement in context.