I'll take that one on. The current act does not prescribe areas underneath that. One of the circumstances we have is that to acknowledge that there's a record is an issue. It's not just the things that she was talking about. If someone's looking for information about a court martial case and they want all the information on the court martial case, but it is a matter of national security, then to acknowledge information in a certain way could in fact indicate that there's a problem just by the very fact that we say we have records. From my perspective, the act, as it's currently put in place for that, does in fact allow us to impose the appropriate level of protection that might need to be on information, merely acknowledging the existence of which could create a problem.
On March 22nd, 2016. See this statement in context.