I understand.
I would like to come back to the Department of National Defence.
I spent a lot of time on the ruling rendered by the Federal Court. You said yourself that the Access to Information Act was quasi-constitutional.
I will read paragraph 8 of the judgment rendered by Justice Kane. I only have the English version. The following is stated:
“Despite this outcome, the applicant has effectively highlighted that the remedies for non-compliance with the Act are limited and that legislative change would be the only way to provide more options and remedies.”
Do you agree with what Justice Kane said?