As my colleague Mr. Lightbound mentioned at the outset, there is the difference between an order-making model and an ombudsman model. One of the issues the Information Commissioner had highlighted was the fact that when it goes to Federal Court, the process has to start de novo, meaning it has to start from the beginning, and there's a lack of efficiency with that because you're reintroducing the same material. Do you think that process should change? I'm asking because if you reintroduce the same thing, there's a time lag and then the requester is waiting for the information. I think the point he tried to make earlier was on that being one of the efficiencies or one of the benefits of using the order-making model as compared to the ombudsman model.
On March 22nd, 2016. See this statement in context.