I wouldn't suggest that you forget about it. You also need to look back into the pre-Internet world. If something ends up in a newspaper, it goes on microfiche and is still accessible. It's just different in the way that we access it now. We're using a search engine and going to the Internet, so it's more readily available than it was then.
From a legal standpoint, the rule book shouldn't change because we have the Internet. The person made those statements, and whether a judge would afford them the right to be forgotten in those circumstances is what's interesting. That's why we always kind of refer back to.... When we talk about third-party reviewing, we allow it to be our judiciary who does that review. They can make the decision on whether this person will or will not have the right. It's not a simple request that I'd like to have that information taken down from the website—