Ms. Bourne-Tyson, in your remarks, you touched on an area that interested me quite a bit and introduced a way of looking at this that perhaps we haven't heard before. You talked about the right to erasure or to be forgotten and pointed out that de-indexing something from a search engine does not hide it, or is not the same as erasure. It's about making something more difficult to find, and the determination of the researcher is a factor in truly being able to either lose or bury information.
You also talked about business failures, criminal backgrounds, and things like that, which people would not wish to have known. It occurred to me then that for things like business failures, professional misconduct, or legal action judgments, especially perhaps those dealing with family court, these public records are created and are typically not made available on the Internet. They're public, but the researcher may have to pay a nominal fee to search, say, a land title. You can't Google somebody's land title or the title to somebody's property, but you can go to a land title office and, depending on the province, pay a few dollars and get that information.
Could you elaborate? I'd like a little further discussion about the separation of public information and online information.