Yes, absolutely, we would concur with all of that.
I would merely point out that a diminished expectation of privacy doesn't mean no expectation of privacy. The question of what is constitutional at the border is constantly being reframed through not only issues of new media and electronic devices but also the other items that were referenced by, for example, our colleague at the CCLA—the question of passwords, compulsion in relation to all of those, and whether or not that constitutes obstruction. In all of those policies we have so much grey in terms of shaping the constitutional framework that we are operating in a definite information deficit.