Okay. Thank you.
Our point about that is that it's two-fold. One, there seems to be a recognition within that directive that something other than a suspicionless search is appropriate in the context of electronic devices. But, as you say, this is not codified in law anywhere. This is merely guidance.
We would like to see and the OPC would like to see that guidance given teeth, the actual strength and ability to be enforceable through the enacting of a consequential amendment to the Customs Act that would essentially make that practice, if it is indeed a practice, and we have no means of actually knowing that at this juncture, codified in law so that we can count on it and say this is the way it is.