Okay. Perhaps when we have the CBA in front of us we can get into the nuts and bolts of that.
This brings me to judicial independence. I think it's proposed section 90.22 in the bill. I could have it wrong. It's in relation to the individual who expresses the concern in relation to judicial independence. It occurs to me that the one who raises the concerns ought to be perhaps the chief justice of the affected court. It shouldn't be an official who is raising the concern of judicial independence.
Would there be an objection from the department to that recommendation?