I would say two things, maybe, on that.
An important distinction is between facts and opinions. Accuracy obviously relates to facts; opinion is freedom of expression and should not be touched by any other entities, as I'm advocating.
Should we go beyond defamation? I think that if information put up by someone about somebody else is factually inaccurate, that can lead to an action under defamation law, but I think it would be more effective to either de-index or take down the information. I think we're playing with the same substantive considerations. It's a question of whether it's okay to have two remedies. I think it is okay to have two remedies: one that's faster, the other the existing defamation law principle.