In this case, and I guess in many cases, that's subjective. It's difficult to contact your office when one is going to four or five of these kinds of events in a week.
This goes to my next question, which is about the spirit. I think everybody agrees that the letter of the code or the spirit of the code...it's the spirit that needs to be respected, but again, you talked about clarity and predictability. I think it's very important for public office holders not to be in a position where they accidentally end up in violation on something that, if you look at the spirit, may actually go the other way. The spirit might actually allow it, but the letter doesn't.
When you talk about the clarity and predictability, when you say you want to make recommendations on the spirit, and then, of course, if there is a complaint made, it would go back to the letter, where is that boundary? Because as much as I think that's very important, I could see that adding less predictability, less clarity, and more subjectivity in terms of what a public office holder can or cannot do.