It actually is, because it has to do with the procedural order of the meeting. It's a point of order. He made a comment. In past comments that have been made at the end—this is not debate; it is to the procedure—you have allowed, as chair, the witness to respond, in this case Mr. Shugart. I'm wondering if, procedurally, you will allow Mr. Shugart to respond to Mr. Poilievre's comment.
On August 11th, 2020. See this statement in context.